Motion to Intervene
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC18564981 - November 18, 2025 Hearing date: November 18, 2025 Case number: CGC18564981 Case title: TIAN ZHANG VS. APEX CONSTRUCTION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC18564981 | Case Title: | | TIAN ZHANG VS. APEX CONSTRUCTION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-18 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO INTERVENE | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for November 18, 2025, line 2. NANCY GAO'S MOTION TO INTERVENE.
Judge Van Aken is recused from hearing this case. Per order of the presiding judge, the matter is continued to November 25, 2025 for hearing by a visiting judge.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”