| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion From Litigating Any Dispute Over Legal Fees Awarded In Any Court Other Than This Court
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC06451025 - November 26, 2025 Hearing date: November 26, 2025 Case number: CGC06451025 Case title: ALEJANDRO BUCIO et al VS. ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED et al Case Number: | | CGC06451025 | Case Title: | | ALEJANDRO BUCIO et al VS. ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED et al | Court Date: | | 2025-11-26 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion From Litigating Any Dispute Over Legal Fees Awarded In Any Court Other Than This Court; Dec Of Matthew J. Matern | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for November 26, 2025, line 8. MATTHEW MATERN AN INDIVIDUAL, MATERN LAW GROUP, PC'S Motion From Litigating Any Dispute Over Legal Fees Awarded In Any Court Other Than This Court. Motion/Denied 1. Requests for Judicial Notice/Granted.
2. On March 29, 2022, the parties entered into a stipulation, and the Los Angeles County Superior Court issued an order, stating that funds awarded from the ABM Industries Overtime Cases matter from San Francisco County, CJC-07-004592, "shall be maintained in the previously established Qualified Settlement Fund for the ABM Industries Overtime Cases matter and shall be withdrawn or dispersed only upon the express written and notarized consent of both Farzad Rastegar and Matthew J. Matern, or by further order of this Court." (RJN, Ex. 2.)
3. Unless the parties acquire a new order clarifying San Francisco Superior Court's authority to exclusively litigate legal fee disputes, the parties are bound by their stipulation and the Los Angeles County Superior Court's order authorizing the Los Angeles County Superior Court to issue orders regarding fee disbursement and withdrawals.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/VJ-BZ) | |