Hess Rehabilitation & Chiropractic Centers, Inc. vs. California Lawyers Group
Motion to Quash Service of Summons
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
5 Hess Rehabilitation Motion to Quash Service of Summons & Chiropractic Centers, Inc. vs. The court GRANTS the unopposed motion to quash service California Lawyers of summons filed by Specially Appearing Defendants Group CALIFORNIA LAWYERS GROUP, INC. and MITRA CHEGINI, individually and dba CALIFORNIA LAWYERS GROUP, INC.
The motion is well-taken and unopposed. The court further notes that the court file does not contain a properly issued Summons.
According to Defendants, Plaintiff filed a substantially similar lawsuit.
Plaintiff is ORDERED to immediately file a Notice of Related Case, as required by Rule 3.300 of the California Rules of Court.
Specially Appearing Defendants to give notice.
6 Lister vs. Valley Motion for Leave to Amend (re First Amended Complaint) Post-Acute And Rehab LLC The court GRANTS the unopposed motion filed by Plaintiff KATHLEEN ROSE LISTER, by and through her Successor-In- Interest HATTIE DAVIS’s for leave to file a proposed First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).
Plaintiff seeks leave to file a proposed FAC that would add a third cause of action for violations of Health and Safety Code section 1430(b) (FAC ¶¶ 82-90) and add references to the Third Cause of Action in the Prayer (see FAC Prayer at ¶¶ 4-5). (See Garcia Decl., Exh. 1.)
According to the motion, the proposed changes result from discovery responses.
The motion appears to be timely, is unopposed, and no apparent prejudice exists to Defendants. The scheduled trial is not until 12/6/27.
3
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”