DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2026-01547162·orange·Civil·Other
Hearing todayGRANTED

Mugavero vs. Lendward

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
C13
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffChad Mugavero
DefendantLendward

Attorneys

Vanya Khanna(Lipeles Law Group, APC)for Plaintiff

Ruling

3 Mugavero vs. Lendward

2026-01547162 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Attorneys Vanya Khanna and Lipeles Law Group, APC’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record for plaintiff Chad Mugavero is GRANTED.

Moving Parties shall file an amended proposed order with Plaintiff’s correct address. The current proposed order contains an error.

The order shall become effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the (amended) signed order upon the client. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

Moving Parties shall give notice.

5 Hainan Guanghua Group USA vs. Guo

2025-01465422 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Attorney Mary Liu and Law Office of Mary Liu’s motion to be relieved as counsel of record for Qingdao Wodi International Trading Co., Ltd. is GRANTED.

Moving counsel shall file an amended proposed order with Responding Party’s (client) correct address. The current proposed order contains no address.

The order shall become effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the (amended) signed order upon the client. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

Attorney Liu shall give notice.

10 Wang vs. Jan

2026-01551895

Motion for Order to Stay Proceedings

Trial courts generally have the inherent power to stay proceedings in the interests of justice and to promote judicial efficiency. (CCP 187; Freiberg v. City of Mission Viejo

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share