DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL-24-001952·stanislaus·FamilyLaw·Child Custody and Property Enforcement
Hearing todayHEARING REQUIRED

CASTRO VS CASTRO

Petitioner's Request for Order re Child Custody, etc.

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
25
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerCASTRO
DefendantCASTRO

Ruling

THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES. The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13: THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES. The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sarah Birmingham in Department #14: THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES. The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Maria Elena Ramos-Ratliff in Department #25: FL-24-001952 - CASTRO VS CASTRO Petitioner's Request for Order re Child Custody, etc.-- HEARING REQUIRED.

The child custody and visitations requests were mediated on August 6, 2026, and are not at issue. This leaves the passport request and the request for enforcement of judgment as to the subject vehicle. Both matters also require the Court to make factual findings and necessitate a hearing. That said, to the extent Petitioner's request also includes an order for the Clerk of the Court to sign transfer of title documents on Respondent's behalf, Petitioner will need to comply with the Local Rules before the Court may grant this request. (Local Rules, rule 7.08(A).)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share