DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV65132·tuolumne·Civil·Discovery / Elder Abuse (implied)
Hearing in about 6 hoursCONTINUED

Richard Bennett vs. Golden Living Congregate Nor-Cal Corp et al

OSC Hearing - Sanctions; Motion Hearing - Compel Prepared Interrogatories, Monetary Sanctions; Motion Hearing - Compel Production of Documents, Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRichard Bennett
DefendantGolden Living Congregate Nor-Cal Corp
DefendantSenior Care of California, LLC
DefendantMichael Maloney
DefendantKatryna Hunt
DefendantMaranda Escobedo
DefendantGeorgina Rodriguez Ramirez
DefendantAsok Mukhopadhyay

Attorneys

William Artiglierefor Plaintiff
Andrew Crossfor Defendant

Ruling

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Hon: Sarah Carrillo

Department 2 August 28, 2026 9:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

14 CV65132 Richard Bennett vs. Golden Living Congregate Nor-Cal Corp et al 02/24/2023

Richard Bennett Attorney: William Artigliere

Golden Living Congregate Nor-Cal Corp Senior Care of California, LLC Michael Maloney Pro Per

Katryna Hunt Pro Per

Maranda Escobedo Michael Maloney Pro Per

Golden Living Congregate Nor-Cal Corp Senior Care of California, LLC Georgina Rodriguez Ramirez Asok Mukhopadhyay Attorney: Andrew Cross OSC Hearing - Sanctions Georgina Ramirez Case Management Conference Further Motion Hearing - Compel Prepared Interrogatories, Monetary Sanctions Motion Hearing - Compel Production of Documents, Monetary Sanctions 09/08/2023 Cross Complaint File Tracking 08/08/2025 High Density

The Court notes no opposition to the motions were filed and the minute order from June 12, 2026, indicated the parties were engaged in discussions regarding the discovery motions. The Court requests a status update as to the discovery motions and if needed, will continue the matter to a future date for the motions to compel to be heard.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share