Shengsheng Guan vs. Tong Liu

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 22CV408359 John Doe vs. The Plaintiff petitions this court to compel Defendant to submit to an independent 1 Harker School, et.al. medical examination. Defendant proposes six hour limitations, object to the administration of cognitive testing, and the administration of certain emotional function tests. The Defendant also opposes Plaitniff’s expert witness Dr Winkel’s expertise. Plaintiff placed his mental state at issue. Defendant’s expert witness ha the qualifications to render an expert opinion.

Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.- 9:00 23CV428070 “Janine” Chun Lu vs. See below 2 Marc Goubert, et.al. 9:00 24CV436322 Exeter 1140-1150 Plaintiff moves this court to enter default judgment against Plaintiff and award 3 Ringwood LLC vs. Gru monetary damages. Plaintiff filed for motion of breach of contract. Defendant Energy Lab, Inc. never paid balance owed Plaintiff. Defendant never objected to this motion. Plaintiff’s motions is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s monetary sanctions in the amount of 580,128.47 is GRANTED. 9:00 24CV443183 Shenna Huynh vs Plaintiff moves this court for issue sanctions.

Plaintiff seeks these remedies from 4 Redis Labs, Inc. et.al. a violation of a May 14 2026 court order. This court ordered monetary sanctions of $10,320 against Defendant—it did deny Plaintiff’s terminating sanctions. This court continued argument regarding the issue of evidentiary sanctions. As indicated in its July 28, 2026 order, this court is concerned with Defendant’s response. But as indicated in its July 28, 2026 order, it does appear that Defendant is attempting to respond to voluminous discovery requests albeit late.

This court finds that discovery has not been completed. This court seeks input from both counsel as to when discovery can be completed. This court will DENY Plaintiff’s motion for evidentiary sanctions, but will leave the issue open to providing a new date of compliance for Defendant. 9:00 25CV47159 Shengsheng Guan vs. Defendant petitions this court to grant four motions to compel. Plaintiff failed to 5-8 Tong Liu answer any of the interrogatories propounded by the Defendant because it was above the required legal limit of thirty five requests.

Defendant agreed and limited the amount to twenty-four requests. Plaintiff has articulated that it is working on the twenty four requests, but the 30 day deadline has not passed yet. Defendant agrees. This court will continue this matter to sometime past the 30 day deadline. Court will seek input from counsel as to new date. 9:00 25CV462132 Eugene P. Silveria Off calendar 9 Trust of the Silveria Family Recoverable Living Trust Created 3/28/2008, et.al. vs. Mo Khan, et.al. 9:00 26CV485320 Maxamuud Jaamac See below 10 vs.

Johnathan Yandoc 9:01 21CV384369 Comerica Bank vs. Defendant motions this court for a claim of exemption from funds that have been 1 Stanley McIntyre, Inc. levied in his account. Defendant as judgment debtor has the burden of proving the funds being levied are exempt. Defendant submits that his monthly income is around $3,000 but his expenses run over $6,700. Defendant also has over $33,000 in his Chase bank account. Defendant omits revenues generated from his contracting business which was reported as a gross income of over $373,000.

Defendant fails to meet his burden. Defendant’s claim for exemption is DENIED.,

3