IN RE THE PETITION OF DANIELLE SCHNEIDER
Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 27, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.
9. S-CV-0053944 IN RE THE PETITION OF DANIELLE SCHNEIDER
Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim
The court continued the matter on April 23, 2026, for petitioner to file a supplemental declaration that attaches the proposed annuity terms for the court’s consideration. However, the supplemental declaration filed with the court on July 17, 2026, does not include the proposed annuity terms. Thus, the court cannot determine whether the proposed annuity is in the best interest of the minor. Accordingly, the petition for approval of minor’s compromise claim is denied without prejudice.
10. S-CV-0057600 LALLISS, STEVEN v. HARRIS, LORENZO
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint
Preliminary Matters
The court observes defendant’s moving and reply papers exceed the page limit delineated in California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1113, subdivision (d). The court admonishes defendant to adhere to the applicable California Rules of Court for future filings.
Defendant’s requests for judicial notice are granted as to the existence of the documents but not any inferences drawn therefrom.
Plaintiff’s requests for judicial notice are granted.
Plaintiff’s objections are overruled in their entirety.
Defendant’s objections are overruled in their entirety.
Ruling on Motion
Defendant moves to strike the entirety of plaintiff’s complaint—which includes causes of action for (1) defamation; (2) public disclosure of private facts; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; (4) bad faith invasion of privacy; and (5) false light invasion of privacy—pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.
PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 3 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”