CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY VS. KRISNIL PRASAD ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant Sunshine Transportation'S Responses To Form Interrogatories Set No. One
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Discovery · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
- Defendant: KRISNIL PRASAD
- Defendant: SUNSHINE TRANSPORTATION
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, December 03, 2025, Line 8.
1 - Plaintiff Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company's Motion to Compel Defendant Sunshine Transport's Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. The discovery requests at issue appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010.)
Defendant has not established that it has provided any responses to the Interrogatories. Defendant's failure to timely respond is not excused. Defendant's contention in its late-filed opposition-filed only three court days before the hearing (and then after hours)-that it intends to serve substantially compliant responses before the hearing does not, in fact, moot the motion. Further Defendant did not make the showing required under section 2030.290(a); in any event, the court declines to exercise its discretion in favor of relief under section 2030.290(a).
No meet and confer requirement exists for motions to compel responses for Interrogatories when no responses have been provided. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290.) Plaintiff, however, met and conferred. Defendant shall serve verified, objection-free, substantive responses to Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories, Set One by December 24, 2025.
The court does not find Defendant Sunshine Transport acted with substantial justification in connection with this discovery. Defendant Sunshine Transport shall pay to Plaintiff Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company, through counsel, $450 as sanctions, payable payment no later than by December 24, 2025. (See Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010, 2023.030, 2030.290(c).)
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) |