Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. ERLA Construction
Motion to Enforce Settlement
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
(Spring Street Courthouse: Dept. 26) August 27, 2026 DEPARTMENT 26 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS
If you desire to submit on the Court's tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Department 26 at the Spring Street Courthouse until the morning of the motion hearing. The e-mail address is [email protected] The heading on your e-mail should contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent.
Please note that if you submit on the court's tentative ruling and do not appear, another party may appear to argue and the court may change its tentative ruling after the oral argument. If there are no appearances by either side and no submission on the Court's tentative ruling, the court will adopt its tentative ruling as its final ruling.
The deadline for a party to withdraw a pending motion, or take it off calendar, is TWO COURT DAYS before the hearing on the motion. The court will enter its tentative ruling on motions that remain on calendar after that deadline.
Please note, the above e-mail address is to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries to this e-mail will not receive a response.
Parties may schedule remote appearances for hearings on motions via LACourtConnect (https://mylacourt.org/laccwelcome). Remote appearances are not permitted for trial or Applications for Order for Appearance and Examination proceedings absent leave of court. **Please note we no longer use CourtCall**
TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc.'s Motion to Enforce Settlement is granted. Judgment is to be entered in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendant ERLA Construction in the amount of $4,000.00 principal, $1,000.00 attorney's fees, and $73.65 costs. Plaintiff is to file and serve a proposed judgment in accordance with this ruling within 20 days.
Analysis: Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed the instant action against Defendant ERLA Construction ("Defendant") on May 7, 2024. Defendant filed an answer to the Complaint on October 25, 2024. On April 14, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement of Entire Case. On June 10, 2026, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Enforce Settlement Pursuant to CCP Sec.664.6; Request for Fees and Costs. The Motion was served on the same day via first-class and electronic mail to Defendant through their attorney. To date, no opposition has been filed.
Discussion
The instant Motion is brought under Code of Civil Procedure, section 664.6, which states in relevant part: If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If the parties to the settlement agreement or their counsel stipulate in writing or orally before the court, the court may dismiss the case as to the settling parties without prejudice and retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement. (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 664.6, subd. (a).)
"Parties" include "an attorney who represents the party" and an insurer's agent. (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 664.6, subd. (b).) The settlement must include the signatures of the parties seeking to enforce the agreement, and against whom enforcement is sought. (J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v. Fair (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 974, 985.) The settlement agreement complies with the statutory requirements set forth above because it was signed by both parties. (Motion, Hernandez Decl., Exh. 1, p. 3.)
The settlement provides that Defendant would pay Plaintiff $5,000.00 in four installment payments starting on April 17, 2026. (Id. at Exh. 1, P.1.) Defendant made the first payment of $1,000.00, but thereafter defaulted. (Id. at P.4 and Exh. 2.) Plaintiff moves for a judgment in the amount of $4,000.00, plus reasonable attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $1,873.65. (Motion, p. 3:23-25.)
In light of Defendant's default, Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment of $4,000.00 principal. The settlement also specifically provides for an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs on a motion to enforce the agreement. (Id. at Exh. 1, P.10.) The Court finds the amount of attorney's fees sought unreasonable given that the instant action is a straightforward collections case, the Motion is unopposed, and Plaintiff's counsel can appear for the hearing remotely. (Id. at P.7.) Nor does the supporting declaration demonstrate that $600.00 is a reasonable hourly rate for the work performed. (Id. at P.6.) Attorney's fees are awarded at an hourly rate of $400.00 for 2.5 hours of time, in the amount of $1,000.00. Costs of $73.65 are also awarded.
Conclusion
Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc.'s Motion to Enforce Settlement is granted. Judgment is to be entered in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendant ERLA Construction in the amount of $4,000.00 principal, $1,000.00 attorney's fees, and $73.65 costs. Plaintiff is to file and serve a proposed judgment in accordance with this ruling within 20 days. Moving party to give notice.
Case Number: 24STLC06939 Hearing Date: August 27, 2026 Dept: 26 TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Kinecta Federal Credit Union's Motion for Attorney's Fees is denied.
Analysis: Plaintiff Kinecta Federal Credit Union ("Plaintiff") brought this action for breach of contract against Defendant Fernando Ponce ("Defendant") on September 24, 2024. Defendant filed an Answer on November 14, 2024. The action came for trial on March 24, 2026, at which time the Court found in favor of Plaintiff. (Minute Order 03/24/26.) Two days later, Plaintiff filed a
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”