UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS. DOORDASH, INC.
Case Information
Motion(s)
Motion To Compel And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion To Compel (Redacted)
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Further Responses
Parties
- Plaintiff: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Defendant: DOORDASH, INC.
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25622395 - December 8, 2025 Hearing date: December 8, 2025 Case number: CGC25622395 Case title: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS. DOORDASH, INC. Case Number: | | CGC25622395 | Case Title: | | UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS. DOORDASH, INC. | Court Date: | | 2025-12-08 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Compel And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion To Compel (Redacted) | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for December 8, 2025, line 4. PLAINTIFF UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S Motion To Compel (Redacted).
The court grants Uber's motion to compel further responses in part. The motion is denied as moot as to RFP 1 and interrogatories 2-4, pursuant to Uber's reply brief. As to the remaining interrogatories, DoorDash raises no substantive argument other than its demand for arbitration, which the court rejects in its companion order. Uber's motion is therefore granted as stated below.
1: DoorDash shall identify which restaurants on Amended Exhibit A (plus any restaurants added by DoorDash) have First-Party and Third-Party contracts with DoorDash.
5-6: DoorDash shall respond based on Amended Exhibit A (plus DoorDash's additions) with information sought by the interrogatories in whole, not merely orders fulfilled. DoorDash's separate statement presents no cogent reason why the interrogatories should not be answered in full as to the limited universe of restaurants in Amended Exhibit A.
7-10, 14: DoorDash shall respond for the restaurants on Amended Exhibit A.
12-13: DoorDash shall respond. Supplemental responses ordered here shall be served within 30 days.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |