DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCU333390·tulare-civil·Civil·Breach of Contract
Hearing todayGRANTED

Guerrero, Ana vs. Stillwater Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Defendant's Motion to Compel Initial Discovery; Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Monetary amounts referenced

$690$1,410$60$240

Parties

PlaintiffAna Guerrero
DefendantStillwater Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Ruling

Case No.: VCU333390

Date: August 25, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 2-The Honorable Bret D. Hillman Motion: Defendant's Motion to Compel Initial Discovery as to (1) Form Interrogatories, Set One; (2) Form Interrogatories, Set Two; (3) Special Interrogatories, Set One; and (4) Requests for Production of Documents, Set One; Sanctions Tentative Ruling: (1) through (4): To grant the motions and order responses within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of this ruling for this motion; to impose sanctions totaling $690 against Plaintiff and counsel of record, jointly and severally, due within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of this ruling for this motion; Defendant shall give notice.

Facts Common to (1) through (4) On May 4, 2026, in this first-party insurance breach of contract lawsuit, Defendant served (1) Form Interrogatories, Set One, (2) Form Interrogatories, Set Two, (3) Special Interrogatories, Set One, and (4) Requests for Production of Documents electronically on Plaintiff's counsel. Responses were due no later than June 5, 2026. As of the date of filing these motions on June 24, 2026, no responses have been received. Defendant seeks to compel initial responses to the above, without objections, and for sanctions of $1,410 per motion consisting of 6 hours (incurred and anticipated) at the rate of $225 per hour plus a $60 filing fee as to each motion. No opposition appears to have been filed.

(1), (2) and (3) Interrogatories Based on Plaintiff's failure to respond to the first and second sets of form and first set of special interrogatories, the Court orders under, Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290(a), that Plaintiff provide full and complete verified responses without objection to Defendant's first and second sets of form interrogatories and first set of special interrogatories, within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of this ruling for this motion. Defendant shall give notice.

(3) Requests for Production Based on Plaintiff's failure to respond to the first set requests for production of documents, the Court orders under, Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.300(a) that Plaintiff provide full and complete verified responses without objection to Defendant's first set of requests for production of documents, within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of this ruling for this motion. Defendant shall give notice.

Sanctions Under Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290(c) (Interrogatories) and 2031.300(c) (Requests for Production), the Court imposes sanctions. However, the Court notes there is no meet and confer requirement and all that is necessary to obtain the relief requested on this motion to compel initial responses is that the other party failed to respond within the designated time. Therefore, the Court will award one half-hour as to each motion at the stated rate, plus $240 in filing fees, for a total of $690 against Plaintiff and counsel of record, jointly and severally, due within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of this ruling for this motion. Defendant shall give notice.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Re: Felix, Jose vs. D.R. Klassen Packing, Inc.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share