DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25NWLC15344·la·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing todayGRANTED

CITIBANK, N.A. vs MILTON SANTOS

Motion to enforce settlement agreement

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
Y
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,926.00$7,703.80$296.02$7,799.82

Parties

PlaintiffCITIBANK, N.A.
DefendantMILTON SANTOS

Ruling

(Norwalk Courthouse: Dept. Y) August 25, 2026 DEPARTMENT Y LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC vs ROXANNE ARGANDONA Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration.

The Court takes judicial notice of the Stipulation Agreement; Jurisdiction Retained Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 signed by Defendant on November 18, 2025 and filed with the Court on December 9, 2025. The Court also takes judicial notice of the Order on Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Judgment entered by the Court on December 31, 2025.

The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments in the amount of $1,000.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $1,296.62 due and owing.

Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Order dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and against Defendant Roxanne Argandona for the remaining sum of $1,296.62 plus court costs of $515.61, for a total judgment of $1,812.23. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 24NWLC28680 Hearing Date: August 25, 2026 Dept: Y

24NWLC28680: PLAZA SERVICES, LLC vs JOHN PAUL GUZMAN Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Plaza Services LLC ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration.

The Court takes judicial notice of the Settlement Agreement with Mutual Release and Stipulation for Entry of Judgment Upon Default ("Stipulation") signed by Defendant on December 9, 2024 and filed with the Court on June 18, 2026 with Plaintiff's moving papers. The Court also takes judicial notice of the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case filed with the Court on May 2, 2025.

The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $697.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $2,866.13 due and owing.

Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. and against Defendant John Paul Guzman for the principal sum of $2,866.13 plus court costs of $324.95, for a total judgment of $3,191.08. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 25NWLC15344 Hearing Date: August 25, 2026 Dept: Y

25NWLC15344: CITIBANK, N.A. vs MILTON SANTOS Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Citibank, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration.

The Court takes judicial notice of the Stipulation For (1) Entry of Judgment Upon Default And; (2) Court Retention of Jurisdiction Under Code of Civil Procedure Sec.664.6 ("Stipulation") signed by Defendant on April 30, 2025 and filed with the Court on July 17, 2026 with Plaintiff's moving papers.

The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $2,926.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $7,703.80 due and owing.

Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Citibank, N.A. and against Defendant Milton Santos for the principal sum of $7,703.80 plus court costs of $296.02, for a total judgment of $7,799.82. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share