DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23VECV03433·la·Civil·Motion to be relieved as counsel
Hearing in about 1 hourGRANTED

In re 23VECV03433

Motion to be relieved as counsel

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
B
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPlaintiff

Attorneys

Fassett(Price Postel and Parma LLC)for Plaintiff

Ruling

(Van Nuys Courthouse East: Dept. B) August 26, 2026 DEPARTMENT B LAW AND MOTION RULINGS Attorneys who elect to submit on these published tentative rulings, without making an appearance at the hearing, may so notify the Court by communicating this to the Department's staff before the set hearing time. See, e.g., CRC Rule 324(b).

Counsel Fassett, of Price Postel and Parma LLC, moves to be relieved as counsel for plaintiff. Counsel appears to have lost contact with plaintiff. This motion was initially heard and denied 7/28/26 by Judge Amerian for failing to specify by what means notice was given to plaintiff. Counsel subsequently refiled and specified that notice was sent to plaintiff's last known address and emailed to plaintiff's last known email. Counsel attempted to contact plaintiff through plaintiff's other counsel (who is not seeking to be relieved). Plaintiff did not file opposition. Trial is set for 9/14/26. As plaintiff has other counsel, a continuance should not be required. GRANT.

Case Number: 23VECV05417 Hearing Date: August 26, 2026 Dept: B Tentative Ruling Motion to be relieved set for hearing Wednesday, 8/26/26. Plaintiff's counsel, Rogstad of The Green Law Group, LLC, moves to be relieved, stating plaintiff has been out of contact with counsel for over a year now. No trial date is set, as the matter was stayed due to bankruptcy. Notice was given to plaintiff via mail and email. No opposition was filed. GRANT.

Case Number: 26VECV04284 Hearing Date: August 26, 2026 Dept: B Tentative Ruling Saghian v. Select Portfolio Services, Case no. 26VECV04284 Hearing date August 26, 2026 Plaintiff Saghian's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Plaintiff Saghian, in pro per, sues defendants Select Portfolio Services, Inc., U.S. Bank, N.A., and Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid & Crane LLP for declaratory and injunctive relief arising from foreclosure proceedings. Plaintiff applied ex parte for a temporary restraining order preventing a trustee's sale and OSC re: preliminary injunction. The court denied the application for lack of exigent circumstances and set the matter for hearing. 7/31/26 Min. Order. Defendants oppose. The planned trustee's sale which necessitated the initial ex parte application was cancelled. See Reply, 2:22-23

Defendants request judicial notice of: (1) Deed of Trust recorded March 27, 2007, LA County Recorder's Office, doc. No. 2007-703335; (2) Motion for Approval of Settlement filed December 27, 2017, In re David Saghian, US Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, Case No. 1:16BK-13077-MT; (3) Order Granting Motion for Approval of Settlement entered January 19, 2018, In re David Saghian, US Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, Case No. 1:16-BK-13077-MT; (4) Quitclaim Deed recorded September 9, 2019 LA County Recorder's Office doc. No. 2019-919044; (5) Grant Deed recorded November 27, 2019 LA County Recorder's Office doc. No. 2019-1309177; (6) Notice of Default

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share