SONNY GUEVARRA VS. CHARLES E. MURPHY ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Motion Type Tags
Motion for Summary Judgment · Motion for Summary Adjudication
Parties
- Plaintiff: SONNY GUEVARRA
- Defendant: CHARLES E. MURPHY
- Defendant: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC24614557 - December 3, 2025 Hearing date: December 3, 2025 Case number: CGC24614557 Case title: SONNY GUEVARRA VS. CHARLES E. MURPHY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24614557 | Case Title: | | SONNY GUEVARRA VS. CHARLES E. MURPHY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-03 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant The Regents Of The University Of California?S Notice Of Motion And Motion For Summary Judgment, Or, In The Alternative, For Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for December 3, 2025, line 2. DEFENDANT THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or, In The Alternative, For Summary Adjudication.
Disclosure: Judge Van Aken discloses that her spouse is employed as a tenured professor at a UC campus in a non-medical field. He has no connection to the events of this case. Disqualification is not required in this circumstance and the court concludes that a reasonable person aware of the facts would not reasonably entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to be impartial. (See Rothman, California Judicial Conduct Handbook (4th ed. 2017) 7:46 at pp. 464-465; CCP 170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii).)
Tentative Ruling: Hearing required. The court's tentative appears below. Defendant's (Regents of the University of California) motion for summary judgment or alternatively, summary adjudication is granted. The court's tentative ruling in its entirety has been sent to counsel via email.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |