DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025PRCE047208·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing todayGRANTED

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT MICHAEL MILLER

Hearing on Petition to Approve Reimbursement of Expenses

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$3,000.00$3,075.38$9,435.52$1,150.76$5,000.00

Parties

OtherRobert Michael Miller
PetitionerBradley Polk Miller
PetitionerSally B. Miller

Ruling

2025PRCE047208: IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT MICHAEL MILLER 08/25/2026 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition to Approve Reimbursement of Expenses

The Court authorizes petitioners Bradley Polk Miller and Sally B. Miller to reimburse themselves $3,000.00 for expenses incurred on behalf of the conservatorship estate. With respect to the loan from Ms. Johnson the Court notes the following issues: The petition does not provide sufficient documentation of how the money loaned from Ms. Johnson was spent. The petition states that on 7/24/25, $3,075.38 room and board charges were paid to Lexington Assisted Living. However, the Lexington invoice shows that the check for the 7/24/25 payment (#6177) was returned on 7/29/25 and there was a reverse payment.

Also, the petition does not state that the 7/24/25 payment came from Ms. Johnson’s loan, although as this payment was returned this is a moot point. The petition also states that on 9/1/25, there was $9,435.52 room and board charges and that $1,150.76 of this amount came from the loan from Ms. Johnson. However, the Lexington invoice states that the payment of $9,435.52 was made on 8/11/25 (not 9/1/25) by #100. Was check #100 from conservators’ account (check number does not align with conservators’ check #2073)?

Did the 8/11/25 payment utilize the entire $5,000.00 loan from Ms. Johnson or just $1,150.76?

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share