DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0208476·shasta·Civil·Sanctions / Trial Setting
Hearing 18 days agoSanctions imposed in the amount of $250 against Plaintiff and Counsel. Parties are ordered to meet and confer regarding proposed trial dates.

Jellison v. Shasta County

Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions; Review Hearing

Hearing date
Aug 7, 2026
Department
63
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$250

Parties

PlaintiffTalea Jellison
DefendantShasta County

Attorneys

Larry L. Baumbachfor Plaintiff

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0208476 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause: On June 24, 2026, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions to Plaintiff Talea Jellison and Counsel Larry L. Baumbach for failure to appear on May 1, 2026 as ordered on February 26, 2026 and failure to appear on June 5, 2026 as ordered on May 1, 2026. Notice of the May 1, 2026 hearing was provided by the Court in the Order of Assignment dated February 26, 2026, which was mailed to counsel on February 26, 2026. When Plaintiff did not appear on May 1, 2026, the Court continued the matter to June 5, 2026.

Per the Notice of Further Trial Setting Conference filed on May 5, 2026, Plaintiff was provided notice of the June 5, 2026 hearing on May 4, 2026. Plaintiff has not filed a written response to the Order to Show Cause. Without sufficient excuse for failing to appear at two properly noticed hearings, monetary sanctions are imposed in the amount of $250 against Plaintiff and Counsel. The clerk is directed to issue an Order of Sanctions.

Tentative Ruling on Review Hearing: This matter is on calendar for a status conference. The Court notes that the matter is at issue and appears to be ready to be set for trial. Defendant has posted jury fees and Plaintiff has waived the right to a jury by not posting within ten days of June 5, 2026. The parties are ordered to meet and confer prior to the hearing regarding proposed dates for trial. The Court intends to set a Mandatory Settlement Conference, a trial date, and a trial readiness hearing on the Butte Exchange that precedes the selected trial date. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar. Plaintiff’s failure to appear will result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for failing to appear on May 1, 2026, June 5, 2026, and August 7, 2026 and failure to timely prosecute.

JOHNSON, ET AL VS. PARENT, ET AL

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share