DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26277422·sf·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing in about 3 hoursGRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

JUSTIN P. GRAVES ET AL VS. ALCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AS SUCCESSOR TO ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
502
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJUSTIN P. GRAVES
DefendantALCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
DefendantAMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES

Ruling

On Asbestos Law and Motion / Discovery Calendar for Tuesday, August 25, 2026, Department 502, Line 1.

2. DEFENDANT AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES' MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant American International Industries' ("AII" or "Defendant") Motion to Strike the Complaint for Punitive damages is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Opposition filed. Reply filed. (The Court's complete tentative ruling was e-served to the parties.)(See Transaction. No. 80434061) The moving party shall lodge with the clerk in Department 502 by the time set for this hearing a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling.

Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on August 25, 2026, at 4:00 p.m in Department 502. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 161 9575 2444; Passcode: 145616. The Court no longer provides a court reporter. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. If a California certified court reporter (CSR) is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address.

There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. =(502/SKF) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share