DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23SMCV01239·la·Civil·FSC
Hearing todayREADY FOR TRIAL; defendants precluded from submitting witness/exhibit list

Not Stated

FSC

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
I
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Next hearing
Sep 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPlaintiff
DefendantSCC General
DefendantAltece

Ruling

(Santa Monica Courthouse: Dept. I) August 24, 2026 DEPARTMENT I LAW AND MOTION RULINGS If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance on the matter, the moving party must contact the opposing party and all other parties who have appeared in the action and confirm that each will submit on the tentative ruling. Please call the court no later than 4:30 p.m. on the court day before the hearing, leave a message with the court clerk at (310) 260-3629 advising her that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling and waive hearing, and finally, serve notice of the Court's ruling on all parties entitled to receive service. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary, and all parties should appear at the hearing.

FSC was supposed to take place in December 2024, but the parties sought a continuance and filed no FSC materials. The court sanctioned the parties but was forced to continue the trial.

On August 19, 2026, plaintiff filed unilateral FSC materials. Plaintiff also waived jury. Plaintiff contends that defendants never posted their fees. The court is inclined to accept plaintiff's waiver, and the case will now be a bench trial. Plaintiff's unilateral submissions encompass all of the required documents, although they are unilateral, not joint. Plaintiff's counsel states that plaintiff tried to start the FSC process last June, but defendants, who now have no lawyer, have gone radio silent. As to SCC General, it cannot appear without counsel. As to the individuals, they can appear and represent themselves, but they still have filed no FSC materials.

As the court warned the parties at the Case Management Conference, if one party attempts to comply with the court's order and the other does not, the party not complying could be subject to evidentiary sanctions. That is the case here. Accordingly, defendants are precluded from submitting a witness or exhibit list. Defendants may cross examine any witness called by plaintiff within the scope of the direct, however. Defendants may also call themselves as witnesses. Defendants may not introduce any documents into evidence, but they may rely on any exhibit actually introduced by plaintiff. With that limit, the case is READY FOR TRIAL.

However, because it now looks like a short bench trial, the trial will go forward on Friday, September 4, 2026, at 10:30 am. The court believes it ought to be completed that day, but if not, the court will set a second day of trial. The court notes the settlement with Altece and will sign the proposed order. Case Number: 24SMCV00754 Hearing Date: August 24, 2026 Dept: I

This is an application by Essex to continue the trial and related dates. There is one and only one reason that might be sufficient. That is that counsel states that a recent health issue precludes him from continuing in the case. At the time the trial date was set, the court expressly warned all parties that there would be no continuances absent truly unforeseen and unforeseeable circumstances. The court gave that warning orally and it is in the minute order. A sudden and serious medical condition would qualify as one of those rare circumstances. The court will inquire

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share