Motion to compel production of accounting records; Motion to compel inspection of property
Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR DEPARTMENT CM05 HON. Judge Ebrahim Baytieh
Date: 05/20/2026 Court Room Rules and Notices
# Case Name Tentative 1 Ho-Probate
Case: Ho-01501457 - Trust
TENTATIVE RULING
MOTIONS TO COMPEL (ROAs 157 and 159)
Stephen Ho, in propria persona (self-represented litigant), has filed a motion to compel production of accounting records (ROA 157) and a motion to compel inspection of property (ROA 159).
There is no evidence before the court that Stephen Ho propounded discovery for production of documents or inspection of land or made any informal request for such information. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.010, Stephen Ho may make demand for such discovery directly on the opposing party. Discovery is designed to be self-executing among the parties without the need for court intervention. (Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal. App. 4th 1431, 1434.)
The court finds sanctions are warranted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010(h) for making motions to compel without substantial justification. Nonetheless, the attorney fee declaration in opposition to these motions does not justify the time expended or the costs incurred. The court imposes reasonable sanctions in the amount of $2,250 against Stephen Ho payable to the Law Office of Sandra Bonds Hickey within 30 days of notice of this ruling, extended for method of service, or on any later date as agreed by the parties in writing.
Counsel for Respondent Bradley Ho is ordered to give notice of this ruling
.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”