DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2025-01534147·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR

Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. vs. Industrial Succession, LLC

Motions to Be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
N15
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantIndustrial Succession, LLC
DefendantPen Manufacturing, LLC

Attorneys

James R. Lingfor Defendant
Brett H. Ramsaurfor Defendant

Ruling

256, 261, [“[M]onetary sanctions against the party’s attorney require a finding [that] the ‘attorney advis[ed] that conduct.’”], quoting Code Civ. Proc., § 2023, subd. (b)(1).)

Defendant shall give notice of this ruling.

9 Creditors Adjustment Motions to Be Relieved as Counsel Bureau, Inc. vs. Industrial Succession, LLC Counsel James R. Ling’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Industrial Succession, LLC is taken OFF CALENDAR as moot.

Counsel James R. Ling’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Pen Manufacturing, LLC is taken OFF CALENDAR as moot.

Pending Motion

Counsel James R. Ling (Counsel) moves to be relieved as counsel for Defendants Industrial Succession, LLC and Pen Manufacturing, LLC.

Substitution of Counsel

On June 3, 2026, Substitutions of Counsel were filed indicating that Counsel Brett H. Ramsaur was substituting for Counsel James R. Ling, as counsel of record for Defendants Industrial Succession, LLC and Pen Manufacturing, LLC. (See ROA #56, #57.)

As a result, Counsel James R. Ling is no longer counsel of record for Defendants Industrial Succession, LLC and Pen Manufacturing, LLC in this litigation.

Accordingly, motions to be relieved as counsel are moot and shall be taken off calendar.

The court clerk shall give notice of this ruling.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share