DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2026-01562032·orange·Civil·Motion to Expunge Mechanics Lien
Hearing todayOff Calendar

Mohan vs. USC Developers LLC

Motion to Expunge Mechanics Lien

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
C11
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

determination regarding the amow1ts that Defendants Don and Lynn Southard and Rob McPherson are to reimburse Western Tap for unauthorized distributions of money and unauthorized payments of their personal expenses. Any such monies should be deducted from distributions payable to any of the Defendants, including from proceeds from the sale of the Dale Street Property

(October 8, 2024 Judgment, emphasis added.)

Moreover, prior to the conveyance, “pending the decision of the Court of appeal... ..counsel for Plaintiff in the Lawsuit advised counsel for the Southards that....no alienation of the property should occur before the Plaintiff’s appeal was resolved.” (Compl. ¶ 46.)

Thus, whether the original Judgment or the Judgment after Trial and Post-Appeal was in effect, both contemplated a lien on the property.

Defendant has not shown that the statute of limitations has run on any of the claims on demurrer. Thus, the Motion is overruled.

10 Mohan vs. USC Developers LLC

2026-01562032 Motion to Expunge Mechanics Lien

Off Calendar 11 Nguyen vs. Gonzales

2024-01374578 Demurrer to Amended Complaint

Defendant Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.’s demurrer to Plaintiff Peter Nguyen’s Second Amended Complaint is sustained.

The Court takes judicial notice of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ROA 13) on its own motion. (See Holland v. Morse Diesel Intern., Inc. (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 1443, 1447–1448.)

A demurrer presents an issue of law regarding the sufficiency of the allegations set forth in the complaint. (Lambert v. Carneghi (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1120, 1126.) The challenge is limited to the “four corners” of the pleading (which includes exhibits attached and

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share