Lomeli de Facio vs. Sodexo, Inc.
Motion to Compel Production
Motion type
Ruling
witness statements, and other documents that relate to Plaintiff’s alleged injury and damages.
Accordingly, the Court grants the motion for an order compelling Plaintiff to comply with the deposition notice and orders Plaintiff to appear for his deposition within 14 days of the notice of ruling, or on such other date as agreed to in writing by Defendant.
In connection with the motion, Defendant is awarded $3,387.06 in attorneys’ fees and costs. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.010, 2023.030.)
The Court denies Defendant’s request for a terminating sanction. As noted in prior rulings (see ROA 305), Defendant has not met its burden of showing that it would be appropriate for the Court to impose the “ultimate sanction of termination” at this juncture. (Atlas v. Davidyan (2025) 113 Cal.App.5th 1086, 1095; see also Cal. Prac. Guide Civ. Pro. Before Trial at ¶ 8:2145.)
Defendant shall give notice of the ruling.
5 First Foundation Inc. vs. Keller
2025-01493220 1. Motion to Compel Production 2. Motion to Compel Production 3. Motion to Compel Production 4. Motion to Compel Production
Continued to 09/28/2026 6 Le vs. Dang
2024-01429637 Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and Judgment
Continued to 11/09/2026 7 Lomeli de Facio vs. Sodexo, Inc.
2020-01162342 Motion to Compel Production
Stayed per appeal. 8 Martinez vs. Fritzsche Motion to Compel Deposition (Oral or Written)
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”