| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Review of DVRO custody/visitation
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 March 26, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
3. RYAN HAYNES V. SONYA LOSSIUS PFL20210153
On December 30, 2025, the parties attended a hearing on the request for a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) filed by Respondent. The DVRO was granted for five years with Respondent and the children as the protected persons. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) for custody orders and a review hearing was set for the present date.
Only Respondent participated in CCRC therefore CCRC was unable to make any recommendations.
The court is maintaining the custody and visitation orders as set forth in the DVRO.
TENTATIVE RULING #3: THE COURT IS MAINTAINING THE CUSTODY AND VISITATION ORDERS AS SET FORTH IN THE DVRO.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”