| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Request for Order (RFO)
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 March 26, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
16. STANLEY DURAN, JR. V. ROSE DURAN 25FL0820
The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on January 8, 2026, and a review hearing on March 26, 2026, following the court issuing a permanent restraining order protecting Respondent.
Parties appeared at the CCRC appointment and reached agreements regarding custody and parenting time. The agreements appear to conflict with the orders issued in the DV-140, which themselves are contradictory. A report with the parties’ agreements and recommendations was filed with the court on January 20, 2026, and mailed to the parties on January 22nd.
Petitioner filed an ex parte request for emergency orders on March 17, 2026. On March 18, 2026, the court granted an order shortening time, as the parties had a review hearing set for March 26th. Petitioner filed the Request for Order (RFO) on March 18, 2026. Respondent was served on March 19th. While the FL-300 states the hearing is set for March 26, 2026 at 1:30 PM in Department 8, that is a clerical error. The hearing is set in Department 5.
Parties are ordered to appear for the hearing in Department 5.
TENTATIVE RULING #16: PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”