Claim of exemption to wage garnishment
2 To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings
LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING
9:00 1 22CV394602 Suzana Hosin vs. Timothy Davis, et.al. Defendant flied a motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed no answer to defendant’s motion. Plaintiff had an accident working for the county and was given a leave of absence as well as assigned to light duty. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
9:00 2 23CV428070 “Janine” Chun Lu vs. Marc Goubert, et.al. See below.
9:00 3 24CV444705 Atta Shehadey vs. Edward Minasian, et. al. Defendant filed a motion to compel further discovery. Plaintiff filed no response to Defendant’s petition. Plaintiff’s answers were either evasive or invited a more full response. Defendant’s petition to compel further discovery is GRANTED. Monetary sanctions are GRANTED.
9:00 4 24CV454184 Mussa Seid vs. Uber Technologies, Inc. See Line 4 below.
9:00 5 24CV449505 Teyhuan Ahluwalia vs. Children’s Discovery Museum of San Jose et.al. Plaintiff petitions this court to compel defendant Rockwell Group Europe for further responses for production of documents as to Set One. The document request was served on defendant on March 27, 2025—over a year’s time. Plaintiff’s petition is GRANTED. Defendant in its moving papers indicated it can propound further discovery within 60 -90 days. Defendant is ordered to comply with court’s order within 60 days. Monetary sanctions of $2,745.00 are GRANTED.
9:00 6 24CV454184 Bernadette Erlach vs. General Motors, LLC Case is continued.
9:00 7 25CV461439 Greg Schwartz Walter vs. Ford Motor Company, et.al. See Line7 below
9:00 8 25CV471971 Ngo Vien vs June Vien Plaintiff moves this court to appoint a partition referee. While Defendant does not oppose the appointment of a partition referee, Defendant and Plaintiff disagree as to who the partition referee should be. Court requests oral argument.
9:00 9 25CV478684 Josep Vargas vs. Hyundai Motor America See below
9:00 10 25CV481571 Capital Asset Exchange & Trading LLC vs. World Tech Co. See below.
9:01 1 19CV358020 Bank of America vs. Sunshine Roybal Claim of exemption to wage garnishment to be heard through oral argument.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”