Motion to Compel Further Response to Interrogatories Set Two; Motion to compel Plaintiff to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories; Motion to compel Plaintiff to provide further responses to Requests for Production of Documents
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
2024CUOR033827: CARMEN MAGALLON vs ROSAYSELA MAGALLON, et al. 05/18/2026 in Department 21 Motion to Compel Further Response to Interrogatories Set Two
Tentative Rulings. Parties and counsel appearing for oral argument should address the tentative decision. Parties may submit on the tentative decision by email, with a copy to all other parties in the matter, to courtroom21@ventura.courts.ca.gov before 8:00 a.m. on the day set for the hearing, with a subject line that includes SUBMISSION ON TENTATIVE, Case Number, Title and Party. If fewer than all parties submit on the tentative, the hearing will proceed, and the tentative ruling is subject to change. The clerk cannot advise if you should still appear or not. The decision of whether to appear for a hearing is to be made by the parties and their counsel. (Dept. 21 Rules & Procedures, p. 4, § II.I.)
The following is a statement of the Courts tentative ruling. The Court may adopt, modify or reject the tentative ruling after hearing. The tentative ruling has no legal effect unless and until adopted by the Court.
Motions: Motions by Defendant Rosaysela Magallon (Defendant):
(1) To compel Plaintiff Carmen Magallon (Plaintiff) to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories (SI); and (2) To compel Plaintiff to provide further responses to Requests for Production of Documents (RPD).
Tentative Ruling:
SI: Defendants motion to compel Plaintiff to provide further responses to the SI (Set Two) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified, code-compliant further responses to the SI, without objection, within 30 days.
RPD: Defendants motion to compel Plaintiff to provide further responses to the RPD is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified, code-compliant further responses to the RPD, without objection (except for the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product objections to RPD Nos. 17-19), within 30 days.
Plaintiff is further ordered to produce a privilege log for each document withheld on the basis of the privilege objections.
Counsel for Defendant to give notice within two (2) court days.
1
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”