Schifeler vs. Neogenomics Laboratories

that you [paid [sic] to Jams that you have npt [sic] recpovered [sic]. That deduction of [redacted] is not acceptable.” (Ibid.)

Thus, there is no evidence that the parties ever came to an agreement as to whether the arbitration fees would be deducted from the settlement payment.

Nor is there any evidence that the parties agreed in writing that the court would retain jurisdiction pursuant to Section 664.6.

The court will deny the motion.

The court clerk shall give notice of this ruling.

9 Schifeler vs. Motion to Transfer Venue Neogenomics Laboratories Defendants Monterey Pathologists Medical Group’s and Jeffrey Thomas Keating, M.D.’s Motion to Transfer Venue to Monterey County Superior Court is taken OFF CALENDAR, pursuant to the court’s orders issued May 30-2025- 5, 2026 (ROA #60), and Defendant Monterey Pathologists Medical Group 01483801 and Jeffrey Thomas Keating, M.D.’s Notice of Taking Motion to Transfer Venue to Monterey County Superior Court Off Calendar filed April 30, 2026 (ROA #56).

10 Alliance Motion to Amend Judgment Funding Group vs. Good Tree Plaintiff Alliance Funding Group’s Motion to Correct Typographical Erro Entertainment and Amend Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. LLC The court will issue the proposed Judgment on Stipulation submitted by Plaintiff Alliance Funding Group. (See ROA #83.) 30-2022- 01293136 Pending Motion

Plaintiff Alliance Funding Group moves to correct a typographical error and amend the Judgment entered on June 2, 2025 nunc pro tunc.

Standard to Amend Judgment

“The general rule is that once a judgment has been entered, the trial court loses its unrestricted power to change that judgment.” (Craven v. Crout (1985) 163 Cal.App.3d 779, 782.)

However, there is an exception whereby the court may “correct clerical errors in a judgment which has been entered.” (Ibid.)

Specifically, Civil Procedure Code section 473(d) provides: