JIMENEZ VS SKECHERS U.S.A, INC.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT ALVARADO VS TRI- TO PROVIDE RESPONSES TO CVRI2501059 VALLEY MEDICAL SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET GROUP CORPORATION ONE Tentative Ruling: Continued by stipulation to July 13.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ESTRELLA VS MAGAVE MOTION TO COMPEL CVRI2503126 CARE, INC. ARBITRATION Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested. In addition to the Ayala-Ventura case, counsel should be prepared to discuss Stoker v. Blue Origin, LLC (2026) 120 Cal.App.5th 91.

6. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME JIMENEZ VS SKECHERS MOTION TO STAY DUE TO

U.S.A, INC. PENDING OVERLAPPING ACTIONS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling, appearances requested.

7. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ESTRELLA VS MAGAVE MOTION TO COMPEL CVRI2504676 CARE, INC. ARBITRATION Tentative Ruling: See related tentative ruling.

8. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME FRIENDS OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM CVRI2505311 RIVERSIDE'S HILLS VS DISMISSAL UNDER CODE OF CIVIL CITY OF RIVERSIDE PROCEDURE SECTION 473(B) Tentative Ruling: Petitioner moves for relief from dismissal of the CEQA cause of action under California Code of Civil Procedure § 473(b), arguing that the failure to file the request for a hearing within 90 days was the result of inadvertence or excusable neglect. Real Party argues that petitioner has changed its explanation from that