| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Defendants' Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jeffrey R. Baron
Case No.: VCU311567 Date: May 18, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 7-The Honorable Nathan D. Ide Motion: Defendants' Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jeffrey R. Baron Tentative Ruling: To continue the hearing as to the application of attorney Jeffrey R. Baron of Bailey & Glasser LLP to appear as counsel p ro hac vice for Defendants to June 1, 2026, 8:30 am, Dept.
9. Facts and Analysis The Court's file has only the notice of motion and motion, the proof of service and the proposed order, but lacks the verified application of Baron as to the requirements of California Rule of Court 9.40. Therefore, the Court continues this matter to June 1, 2026, 8:30 am, Dept.
9. If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings. Re: Ureche, Oakes J. vs. Six-Gs Automotive, Inc.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”