FLORES v. DIANA BENYAMIN, INC., et al.

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 12, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 24CV00945 FLORES v. DIANA BENYAMIN, INC., et al. (UNOPPOSED) MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT Based on the pleadings submitted, the settlement is entitled to a presumption of fairness and no evidence having been presented to overcome the presumption, the motion for final approval is granted. The Court will sign the proposed order and judgment, and will set a nonappearance hearing date to confirm the distribution.

No. 25CV00883 MEDINA v. GULLMAN DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE The demurrers are primarily overruled except as to the demurrer to plaintiff Leichty’s breach of contract cause of action and the demurrer to the ninth cause of action. Leave to amend is granted. The motion to strike is denied. I. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT