[ Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Ex Parte Application for Entry of Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MERCED
Ex Parte Application Calendar Commissioner David Foster Courtroom 9
627 W. 21st Street, Merced
Friday, August 14, 2026 1:15 p.m.
Case No. Title / Description
25CV-06626 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Ex Parte Application for Entry of Judgment
Plaintiff’s ex parte application for entry of stipulated judgment is GRANTED. It is undisputed that Defendants defaulted under the payment terms of the settlement agreement between the parties. The Court will sign the proposed order and proposed judgment submitted by Plaintiff.
The court hearing scheduled for April 1, 2027, is vacated.
25CV-02752 Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC vs. Juan Villegas
Ex Parte Application for Order Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading
Appearance required.
The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.
2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your inten t to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”