NICHOLAS v LEMP, et al
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
NICHOLAS v LEMP, et al
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
These matters involve real property disputes between Danny E. Nicholas (“Plaintiff”) and Lani Arellanes (“Arellanes”) and Cathy Lemp (“Lemp.”)
Now before the Court are three separate motions for judgment on the pleadings brought by Lemp, with each motion seeking judgment on a different cause of action in the Complaint. The motions were filed on July 22, 2026. On July 24, 2026, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff filed his FAC on July 24, 2026. Accordingly, as the FAC was filed after the motions for judgment on the pleadings were filed, the motions are now moot.
The motions for judgment on the pleadings are therefore DENIED, without prejudice.
The clerk shall provide notice of this ruling to the parties forthwith. No further formal Order is required.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”