Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted
May 13, 2026, Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________
02:00 PM LINE 8 24-CLJ-01117 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. HYUN CHO
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. HARLAN M. REESE HYUN CHO DENNIS SMITH
Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted
TENTATIVE RULING:
Initially, the court notes that plaintiff has provided the improper address for the hearing. Department 28 is not located in Redwood City as the notice states, but instead at the Central Courthouse, Courtroom I, 800 North Humboldt St., San Mateo, CA 94401. (See Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1110 [the Notice “must specify” the location of the hearing].)
The unopposed motion is GRANTED. The genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters in plaintiff’s Requests for Admission, Set One, are deemed admitted.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, plaintiff’s counsel shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action. The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”