Southern Income Properties, L.L.C. vs. Leisure Pro LTD
Motion for Leave to Amend (re First Amended Complaint)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
fn. 9 [“A declaration not signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of California has ‘no evidentiary value’ and can be disregarded.”].)
Moving Attorney to give notice.
4 Southern Income Motion for Leave to Amend (re First Amended Complaint) Properties, L.L.C. vs. Leisure Pro LTD Revised at 2:55 pm, 8/13/26.
The court GRANTS Plaintiff SOUTHERN INCOME PROPERTIES, LLC’s unopposed motion for leave to file a proposed First Amended Complaint (FAC).
According to the moving papers, Defendants (including the new proposed defendant, LP SCUBA, LLC) have stipulated to the filing of the proposed FAC and Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss an earlier filed unlawful detainer action (Southern lncome Properties, L.L.C. v. LP Scuba, L.L.C., Case No. 30- 2024-01425415-CU-UD-CJC), as possession is no longer an issue. The FAC would essentially result in consolidation of related issues into one case.
Plaintiff has substantially complied with the procedural requirements for leave to amend under Rule 3.1324 of the California Rules of Court.
In sum, the court GRANTS the unopposed motion.
Plaintiff may file the proposed First Amended Complaint (attached as Exhibit 1 to Janecek Declaration) no later than five court days from the date of this hearing.
Trial date of 2/22/27 to remain.
Plaintiff to give notice.
5 Gill vs. Estate of Motion for Leave to Amend (re First Amended Complaint) Joan M. Gray
3
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”