DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
12·orange·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 10 days agoCONTINUED

Krishnamoorthy vs. The Irvine Company, LLC

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
W8
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantTHE IRVINE COMPANY LLC
DefendantIRVINE PARK WEST APARTMENTS LLC
DefendantIRVINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Attorneys

James C. Truxawfor Defendant

Ruling

Any outstanding jury fees are due within 10 court days of this order or will be deemed waived. (See Civ. Proc. Code, § 631.)

Plaintiff to give notice.

12 Krishnamoorthy vs. Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication The Irvine Company, LLC The court CONTINUES Defendants THE IRVINE COMPANY LLC, IRVINE PARK WEST APARTMENTS LLC, and IRVINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication to September 4, 2026, at 9:30 am in Dept. W8.

In support of their motion, Defendants submit surveillance footage of the incident as Exhibit I to the Declaration of James C. Truxaw (ROA 110) and rely on that footage in support of Defendant’s Separate Statement Nos. 14-19. Exhibit I provides only a link to a DropBox folder that the court is unable to access.

Similarly, the Dropbox link to the surveillance footage provided by Plaintiffs in their opposition (ROA 183) is also inaccessible to the court.

The parties SHALL have five days from this ruling to lodge the surveillance footage referenced in their respective filings on a thumb/flash drive.

No further briefing permitted.

Defendants are ordered to give notice.

20 Mallett vs. City of Specially set @ 1:30 pm: Santa Ana Motion for Trial Preference Pitchess Motion

17

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share