DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24-01442766·orange·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 7 days agoDENIED as moot

Kobold vs. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.

Motion to compel; Motion to deem matters admitted; Request for sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
W15
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,230$2,130.00

Parties

PlaintiffBryce Kobold
DefendantAmerican Honda Motor Company, Inc.

Ruling

118 Kobold vs. American Honda Motor Company, Inc., 24-01442766 Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. filed a number of motions: (1) Motion to compel responses from Plaintiff Bryce Kobold to Request for Production and for monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,230. (ROA 62.) (2) Motion to compel responses from Plaintiff Bryce Kobold to Form Interrogatories and Special Interrogatories and for monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,230. (ROA 58.) (3) Motion to Deem Matters Admitted by Plaintiff and for monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,230 (ROA 66.)

The issue presented here appears to be that the discovery provided by plaintiff did not include verifications. Plaintiff represents in opposition to the motions that verifications have now been provided. As a result, the motions are all DENIED as moot.

As to the issue of sanctions, the Court awards reduced sanctions as a result of the duplicative nature of the motions. The Court awards sanctions in the amount of $2,130.00 total against Plaintiff. Sanctions are to be paid within 20 days.

Defendant to give notice. 119 Yasuda vs. Pacific Life Insurance Company, 25-01451322 Off-calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share