In the Matter of Lonna Lee Garza Trust
Petition concerning internal affairs of trust; Trustee compensation
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
In the Matter of Lonna Lee Garza Trust 26-52729
PETITION CONCERNING INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF TRUST AND FOR ORDER: (1) APPROVING NINTH, TENTH, AND ELEVENTH TRUST ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS OF TRUSTEE, AND (2) APPROVING TRUSTEE COMPENSATION
TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed.
In The Matter of The Joan I. Amir Revocable Trust 26PR000139
PETITION
APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The parties shall attend prepared to discuss whether any opposition is anticipated, whether the parties intend to submit on verified pleadings and affidavits (see Evangelho v. Presoto (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 615, 620), whether any discovery or other pre-hearing practice is anticipated, and whether the parties are willing to participate in informal settlement discussions or other alternative dispute resolution proceedings. Should any party desire an evidentiary hearing, the parties shall be prepared to provide the Court with an estimate for the length of the hearing, and to set the hearing on the Court’s calendar. Counsel are directed to meet and confer on the foregoing issues prior to the hearing.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Andre Nave-Hernandez v. SRGA Resort, LP et al 25CV002138
[1] PLAINTIFF ANDRE NAVE-HERNANDEZ’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT SRGA RESORT, LP, TO FORM INTERROGATORIES EMPLOYMENT, SET ONE, REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE, AND FOR SANCTIONS
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to August 13, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A.
Plaintiff Andre Naves-Hernandez moves, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2030.300, subdivision (d), 2031.310, subdivision (h), 2023.030 subdivision (a) and 2023.040, for an order compelling Defendant SRGA Resort, LP, to produce further responses to Plaintiff’s Form Interrogatories, Employment, Set One., Nos. 200.1, 200.4, 200.6, 201.4, 201.5, 201.6, 207.1, 207.2, 211.1, 211.2, 214.1, 214.2, 215.1, 215.2, 216.1, Request for Production, Set
5
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”