Stellio Nederovique v. Jelena Smith

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 STELLIO NEDEROVIQUE,) Case Number: FDV-25-818547) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: May 12, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 JELENA SMITH,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) The parties in this matter are Petitioner Stellio Nederovique and Respondent Jelena Smith.

The 18 parties are not married and they used to date. The parties do not have minor children in common. 19 Petitioner is represented by attorney Yosef Peretz. To date, Respondent has not made an 20 appearance in this matter. 21 2) Several hearing dates transpired between 8/15/2025 and 12/5/2025 during which Petitioner stated 22 he was having trouble getting Respondent served. On 10/31/2025, Judge Gold made a finding that 23 Respondent is evading service and required Petitioner to serve Respondent by email or text. 24 3) On 12/5/2025, following a hearing during which Respondent was not present, a 2-year 25 Restraining Order After Hearing was granted for Petitioner’s protection against Respondent. 26 4) On 5/5/2026, the Court granted an ex parte request by Petitioner that he be permitted to have 27 Respondent served with the restraining order by alternate means.

The Court ordered that service 28 of the restraining order be accomplished by email and text “and to known social media account(s) 29 via messenger or comparable method of communication.”

1 5) Now on for hearing is Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 3/18/2026 asking the Court to award 2 him $65,645 in attorney’s fees and $7,342.10 in costs under Family Code section 6344. 3 6) There is no Proof of Service on file showing service of Petitioner’s 3/18/2026 Request for Order. 4 However, the Court notes that in Petitioner’s attorney’s declaration filed 3/18/2026, Petitioner 5 requests that the Court authorize alternative service. 6 B. Findings and Order 7 1) The hearing on Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 3/18/2026 is hereby continued to Tuesday, 8 7/21/2026 at 9:00 AM in Dept. 404. 9 2) At least 20 calendar days prior to the next hearing date, Petitioner shall file and serve a 10 declaration explaining why he believes (pursuant to Family Code section 6344(c)) that 11 Respondent has or is reasonably likely to have the ability to pay the fees and costs requested. 12 Petitioner shall include in his declaration statements addressing whether he believes Respondent 13 has any assets or debts; whether Respondent was employed or self-employed during their dating 14 relationship (and what profession); how much he believes Respondent was earning at the time; 15 and how Respondent covered her expenses during their dating relationship.