Jenna Rose Nicoletti Williams v. Reagan Boyd Williams

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 JENNA ROSE NICOLETTI WILLIAMS,) Case Number: FDI-25-801799) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: May 12, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 REAGAN BOYD WILLIAMS,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF ADVANCE OF COMMUNITY PROPERTY 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) The parties in this matter are Petitioner Jenna Williams (Mother) and Respondent Reagan 18 Williams (Father).

The parties married on 6/24/2006. Mother contends the parties separated on 19 6/8/2025, for a marriage of 18 years and 11 months. Father has not filed a Response to the 20 Petition, although he has appeared at prior hearings in this matter. The parties have two children, 21 Emerson (DOB: 9/28/2007, age 18) and Porter (DOB: 1/19/2010, age 15). Mother is represented 22 by attorney Julia Bressman. Father is self-represented. 23 2) On for hearing is Mother’s Request for Order filed 3/23/202 asking the Court to order Father to 24 transfer to Mother $150,000 from Charles Schwab account #2757 within 5 days “which will be 25 treated as [an] advance of community subject to later offset.”

Mother states the parties’ Charles 26 Schwab account #2757 held a balance of $1.1 million as of 8/25/2025 (near the parties’ date of 27 separation). Mother states the entirety of the funds in that account were obtained during marriage 28 and are community property. Mother states Father has complete control and access to that 29 account “and has used these funds at his discretion since the date of separation.” Mother states

1 Father does not pay base support to her on time and has not paid Smith / Ostler support for the 2 period 9/15/2025 – 12/31/2025. Mother states she is currently living month-to-month and she 3 requires an advance from the community estate “so that I can stay ahead of my expenses.” 4 3) Per the Proof of Service filed 4/7/2026, Mother’s Request for Order was personally served on 5 Father on 4/3/2026. 6 4) Father has not filed a Responsive Declaration. 7 B. Findings and Order 8 1) Mother’s unopposed request for a $150,000 advance from Charles Schwab account #2757 is 9 hereby granted.

Father shall pay this amount to Mother from Charles Schwab account #2757 no 10 later than 5/17/2026 at 5:00 PM. 11 2) Mother’s attorney shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 12 3) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 13 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 14 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 15 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 16 proposed order after hearing directly to the court.