DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0003423·nevada·Civil·Family Law
Hearing about 1 month agoCONTINUED

Munn, Brian Douglas v. Martinez, Dana Ashley

Status Conference

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 8, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMunn, Brian Douglas
RespondentMartinez, Dana Ashley

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 07/10/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0003423 Petitioner: Munn, Brian Douglas Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Martinez, Dana Ashley Attorney: Self-Represented

1. Status Conference is continued to 01/08/2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 01/05/2027.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents. b. Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons if the parties want too measure the 6 months + 1 day period until termination of marital status by the date of Proof of Service rather than by date of Response. FL-115 is not complete. The address, date and time of service information is missing.

3. The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 01/08/2027, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.

4. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.

__________________________________________________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share