Corey Derounce Royal-Million v. Tony John Royal-Million
Case Information
Motion(s)
Request for Order re: Financial Disclosures; Request for Order re: Discovery and Sanctions
Motion Type Tags
Other · Motion to Compel Discovery · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Petitioner: Corey Derounce Royal-Million
- Respondent: Tony John Royal-Million
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 COREY DEROUNCE ROYAL-MILLION,) Case Number: FDI-24-800431) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: May 12, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 TONY JOHN ROYAL-MILLION,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES; REQUEST FOR ORDER: SEE 13 ATTACHMENT MC 030 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) The parties in this matter are Corey Royal-Million (Petitioner) and Tony Royal-Million 19 (Respondent) The parties married on 10/22/2017.
The parties agree they separated in 2023 (exact 20 date disputed), for a marriage of between 5 and 6 years. The parties have no minor children in 21 common. Both parties are self-represented. 22 2) On 7/29/2021, in related Case No. FDV-21-815745, the Court issued a 3-year Restraining Order 23 After Hearing for Respondent’s protection against Petitioner. The restraining order expired on 24 7/28/2024. 25 3) On 11/21/2025, in related Case No. FDV-17-813401, the Court issued a 5-year Restraining Order 26 After Hearing for Petitioner’s protection against Respondent.
The restraining order expires on 27 11/21/2030. 28 4) On for hearing is Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 3/20/2025 asking the Court to order 29 Respondent to file a current and complete Income and Expense Declaration, supplement his
1 financial disclosures to reflect all income earned after his initial disclosures were served 2 (including cash or informal work), produce supporting documentation sufficient to verify income, 3 and for the Court to reserve jurisdiction to impose sanctions should Respondent fail to comply 4 with ongoing disclosure obligations. 5 5) On 5/5/2026, Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration wherein Respondent states he filed an 6 updated Income and Expense Declaration at the beginning of 2026 (the Court notes the most 7 recent Income and Expense Declaration filed by Respondent was filed on 1/28/2026).
Respondent 8 states his financial situation has not significantly changed since he “submitted [his] previous FL- 9 150 along with [his] financial disclosures.” Respondent states Petitioner has filed 5 Requests for 10 Order that have either been denied or dismissed or for which he has failed to attend the hearing. 11 Respondent states Petitioner is “using the judicial system as another vector of abuse.” 12 6) Also on for hearing is Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 4/15/2026 asking the Court to make 13 various orders regarding discovery and to issue sanctions. 14 7) On 5/5/2026, Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration providing substantive responses to 15 Petitioner’s discovery and sanction requests. 16 8) Per the Proof of Service filed 5/6/2026, Respondent’s Responsive Declarations were mailed to 17 Petitioner on 5/5/2026. 18 9) Petitioner did not file Reply Declarations. 19 B.
Findings and Order 20 1) The hearing on Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 4/15/2026 is hereby continued to the 21 discovery calendar on 8/7/2026 at 1:30 PM in Dept. 405A, to join the hearing already set on that 22 date on a separate Request for Order. 23 2) Regarding Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 3/20/2025, the orders Petitioner requests are 24 already covered by statute. Both parties are under an ongoing obligation under Family Code 25 section 2100(c) “to immediately, fully, and accurately update and augment [their financial 26 disclosures] to the extent there have been any material changes.”
Respondent states he has filed 27 an updated Income and Expense Declaration and there have been no material changes since. 28 Petitioner may conduct discovery (as it appears he is already doing) if he believes a material 29 change in Respondent’s financial situation has occurred which Respondent has not disclosed. The
1 Court’s ability to issue sanctions related to these issues is reserved. The Court makes no further 2 orders regarding these issues at this time. 3 3) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 4
8
12
16
20
24
28
29