JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. RINGENBERG
Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Judgment and Dismiss Action Without Prejudice
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR AUGUST 14, 2026
4. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. RINGENBERG, 26CV0100
Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Judgment and Dismiss Action Without Prejudice
TENTATIVE RULING # 4: THE MOTION IS GRANTED. THE COURT HEREBY VACATES
DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT ON APRIL 30, 2026, AND
DISMISSES PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT (1999) 19
CAL.4TH 1232, 1247), UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AND REQUEST FOR
ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE
DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF AN INTENT TO
APPEAR MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID
NOTICE MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID
NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”