DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0051334·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing 17 days agoGRANTED

POMEROY, DANIELA v. VERMA, GAUTAM

Motion to Compel Further Responses (various)

Hearing date
Aug 7, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Dec 11, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDaniela Pomeroy
DefendantGautam Verma
DefendantSodhi Transportation, Inc.
Cross-DefendantGranite Construction Company

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 7, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

9. S-CV-0051334 POMEROY, DANIELA v. VERMA, GAUTAM

Cross-Defendant Granite Construction Company’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant Sodhi Transportation, Inc. to Form Interrogatories, Set One

The unopposed motion is granted.

Defendant Sodhi Transportation, Inc. shall provide further verified responses, without further objections, to form interrogatories, set one, nos. 1.1 and 17.1 by August 17, 2026.

Cross-Defendant Granite Construction Company’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant Sodhi Transportation, Inc. to Request for Admissions, Set One

The unopposed motion is granted.

Defendant Sodhi Transportation, Inc. shall provide further verified responses, without further objections, to request for admissions, set one, nos. 1 through 11 by August 17, 2026.

Cross-Defendant Granite Construction Company’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant Sodhi Transportation, Inc. to Special Interrogatories, Set Two

The unopposed motion is granted.

Defendant Sodhi Transportation, Inc. shall provide further verified responses, without further objections, to special interrogatories, set two, nos. 1 through 7 by August 17, 2026.

Cross-Defendant Granite Construction Company’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant Gautam Verma to Form Interrogatories, Set One

The unopposed motion is granted.

Defendant Gautam Verma shall provide further verified responses, without further objections, to form interrogatories, set one, nos. 1.1 and 17.1 by August 17, 2026.

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 7, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

9. S-CV-0051334 POMEROY, DANIELA v. VERMA, GAUTAM

Cross-Defendant Granite Construction Company’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant Gautam Verma to Request for Admissions, Set One

The unopposed motion is granted.

Defendant Gautam Verma shall provide further verified responses, without further objections, to request for admissions, set one, nos. 1 through 11 by August 17, 2026.

Cross-Defendant Granite Construction Company’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant Gautam Verma to Requests for Production of Documents, Set Two

The unopposed motion is granted.

Defendant Gautam Verma shall provide further verified responses and responsive documents, without further objections, to requests for production of documents, set two, nos. 24 through 46 by August 17, 2026.

Cross-Defendant Granite Construction Company’s Motion to Compel Further Responses from Gautam Verma to Special Interrogatories, Set Two

The unopposed motion is granted.

Defendant Gautam Verma shall provide further verified responses, without further objections, to special interrogatories, set two, nos. 9 through 76 by August 17, 2026.

Mediation Status Conference

The court has carefully considered the joint status conference statement of the parties. The mediation status conference is continued to DECEMBER 11, 2026 at 8:30 A.M. in DEPARTMENT 1. The court’s tentative ruling procedures shall apply to the hearing.

Any joint mediation status conference statement shall be filed 10 days prior to the hearing.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share