DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV011425·sacramento·Civil·Employment
Hearing 10 days agoThe Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court’s concerns. The Court will sign the Proposed Order.

STEVANS vs KRATOS DEFENSE & SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION;, et al.

Status Conference (Compliance Hearing)

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
8B
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSTEVANS
DefendantKRATOS DEFENSE & SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC.

Ruling

24CV011425: STEVANS vs KRATOS DEFENSE & SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION;, et al. 08/14/2026 Status Conference (Compliance Hearing) in Department 8B

Tentative Ruling

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

The Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court's concerns. The Court will sign the Proposed Order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share