DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623874·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 days agoGRANTED

ANDREW LINTON ET AL VS. ALI A. AMINI ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-626928 WITH CASE CGC-25-623874

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffANDREW LINTON
DefendantALI A. AMINI
DefendantVESTA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.
DefendantPAULA GRIFFITHS

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 14, 2026. Line 2. DEFENDANT VESTA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAULA GRIFFITHS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-626928 WITH CASE CGC-25-623874 is GRANTED. No opposition filed. Cases are consolidated for all purposes. Case CGC-25-623874 shall be the lead case. The parties are not precluded from deposing and questioning Plaintiff Linton about the allegations and issues in Case No. 25-626928. =(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share