DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23608547·sf·Civil·Civil
Hearing 10 days agoGRANTED

DEVIN DEUTSCH ET AL VS. FELINK INVESTMENTS & PROPERTIES USA, LLC, A ET AL

Motion For Good Faith Settlement Determination

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDevin Deutsch
DefendantFelink Investments & Properties USA, LLC
Cross-DefendantD2 Properties of Florida, LLC
Cross-DefendantAndrew Nicholls

Ruling

Matter on the LAW AND MOTION / DISCOVERY Calendar for Friday August 14, 2026, line 2, CROSS DEFENDANTS D2 PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ANDREW NICHOLLS' Motion For Good Faith Settlement Determination

The unopposed motion for determination of good faith settlement is granted for good cause shown in the moving papers. The court determines that the June 8, 2026, settlement between cross-complainant Felink Investments & Properties USA LLC and cross-defendants D2 Properties of Florida LLC and Andrew Nicholls is a good faith settlement pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 877 and 877.6. This determination bars any other joint tortfeasor or co-obligor from any further claims against the settling tortfeasor or co-obligor for equitable comparative contribution, or partial or comparative indemnity, based on comparative negligence or comparative fault. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 877.6, subd. (c).)

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. If no party contests the tentative ruling, it will be adopted verbatim in a minute order.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share