DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV3010·eldorado·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 10 days agoCONTINUED. APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. ROSEMARY L MAKAMIYO

MOTION FOR ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS AS ADMITTED

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 18, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
DefendantRosemary L Makamiyo

Attorneys

Edgar B. Lopezfor Plaintiff

Ruling

August 14, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings

8. 25CV3010 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. ROSEMARY L MAKAMIYO, AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION FOR ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS AS ADMITTED

ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION DUE TO LACK OF JUDICIAL COVERAGE, THE COURT WILL HEAR THIS MATTER ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT NINE. THERE WILL BE NO HEARING ON AUGUST 14, 2026. SHOULD A PARTY WISH TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, THE BELOW PROCEDURES REMAIN IN EFFECT. On June 8, 2026, Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Deeming the Truth of the Matters Specified in Plaintiff's Request for Admissions as Admitted; Declaration of Edgar B.

Lopez, Esq.; Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order; Proposed Order (the "Motion"). On July 16, 2026, the Court entered an Order to dismiss the action pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement filed on July 14, 2026, rendering Plaintiff’s motion moot. At the hearing on July 24, 2026, Plaintiff requested a continuance. The Court set the hearing for August 14, 2026. TENTATIVE RULING #8: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2026, AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT NINE. IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR BY ZOOM, PLEASE CONTACT THE COURT AT (530) 621-5867 AND MEETING INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED.

32

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share