David Siu-Kung Ma v. Jennifer Ramirez

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 DAVID SIU-KUNG MA,) Case Number: FMS-25-387578) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: April 28, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 JENNIFER RAMIREZ,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME), 13 SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT, AND SANCTIONS UNDER FAMILY CODE SECTION 271; 14 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME), 15 SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT, AND SANCTIONS UNDER FAMILY CODE SECTION 271 16 TENTATIVE RULING 17 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 18 Court makes the following findings and orders: 19 A.

Procedural History 20 1) The parties are Petitioner David Siu-Kung Ma (Father) and Respondent Jennifer Ramirez 21 (Mother). They share two minor children: Kira Doris Shuvalov (DOB: 08/10/17) and Rafael 22 Eduard Shuvalov (DOB: 11/30/19). 23 2) On January 7, 2026, Father filed a Request for Order seeking: 24 a. An increase in parenting time to Wednesday at 6:00 p.m. – Sunday at 8:00 a.m. for Father 25 and Sunday at 8:00 a.m. – Wednesday at 6:00 p.m. for Mother. 26 b. Modification of guideline support. 27 c.

The parties to alternate claiming the children as dependents on a year-to-year basis. 28 d. Communication between the parties to be respectful and limited to child related issues 29 only.

1 e. Proof of actual payment of childcare costs to family members. 2 f. Travel orders. 3 g. Sanctions under Family Code section 271. 4 3) On January 28, 2026, Mother filed a Responsive Declaration wherein she asks the Court to deny 5 any and all relief requested by Father, asserting that Father has not met his burden to show a 6 change of circumstance. 7 4) On January 30, 2026, Father filed a Reply Declaration, which has been read and considered by 8 the Court. 9 5) On April 15, 2026, Mother filed Respondent’s Supplemental Declaration Regarding Custody and 10 Visitation, which has been read and considered by the Court. 11 6) On April 16, 2026, Father filed Petitioner’s Supplemental Declaration, which has been read and 12 considered by the Court. 13 B.

Findings and Order 14 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 15 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 16 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 17 child is the United States. 18 2) The Court finds good cause to rule on Father’s Request for Order filed January 7, 2026 as 19 follows: 20 a. An increase in parenting time to Wednesday at 6:00 p.m. – Sunday at 8:00 a.m. for Father 21 and Sunday at 8:00 a.m. – Wednesday at 6:00 p.m. for Mother is DENIED.