DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV1459·eldorado·Civil·Third-Party Claim of Ownership
Hearing about 1 month agoGRANTED

SERRANO EL DORADO OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION VS. JOEL SOLOMON ET AL

MOTION TO EXONERATE UNDERTAKING

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$10,000

Parties

PetitionerG&P Enterprises, LLC dba Allied Trust ee Services
OtherFree Will Foundation, Inc.
DefendantJOEL SOLOMON

Ruling

July 10, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings

2. 22CV1459 SERRANO EL DORADO OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION VS. JOEL SOLOMON ET AL MOTION TO EXONERATE UNDERTAKING

On or around December 18, 2025, Petitioner, G&P Enterprises, LLC dba Allied Trustee Services posted an Undertaking in the amount of ten thousand ($10,000) in connection with a third-party claim of ownership filed by Free Will Foundation, Inc. pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 720.260.

On February 13, 2026, the Court granted Petitioner’s Petition for Determination of Third- Party Claim of Ownership and denied the third-party claim.

On March 27, 2026, the Court issued an Order Granting Judgment Assignee’s Petition, Denying Third-Party Claim of Ownership and Confirming Levy wherein the Court ordered the “undertaking posted by Petitioner Allied in connection with this proceeding is exonerated and no claim may be made against the surety based on the Third-Party Claim.”

On May 20, 2026, Petitioner filed a Notice of Motion to Exonerate Undertaking; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Allied asserts that no undertaking is required as the Court has determined the third-party claim of ownership in favor of Petitioner and against the third-party claimant. Allied requests the Court issue an order exonerating the undertaking posted by Allied pursuant to CCP § 720.260 and directing the bond be released and the surety relieved of all obligations. Allied’s motion is unopposed.

TENTATIVE RULING #2: PETITIONER’S REQUEST IS GRANTED. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999).

NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.

LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY

July 10, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings

AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share